Well I think that Mumbai and Delhi are metropolitan cities. And these are few of the cities that have the facility of International Airports. Himachal Pradesh and Northeastern India has a lot of tourists but the only fact that Mumbai and Delhi are rated at the top is because of the fact that I have mentioned above.
Not necessarily, sure tourists are more likely to visit Delhi or Mumbai because of their popularity outside, but tourists also visit alot of locations for their heritage, prevelant in places like Rajasthan. I agree they are less likely to visit hill stations, but Goa is a hot spot among tourists and famous for its beaches and the kind of stress free life tourists are willing to find.
Speaking of my personal experience I would say places other than Mumbai and Delhi are more visited. On my visit to Udaipur, I have seen a huge number of tourists as compared to the tourists in Delhi or Mumbai.
I think people like to visit hill stations and beaches more. Delhi and Mumbai have more crowd of people coming for work.
Yes they have the most tourism than any other places because beaches are so close to mumbai and delhi itself is the capital of india
No, it's just that these are more popular among tourists but surely other places are being visited by tourists on same scale or more than in delhi or mumbai.
No I don’t think so ..People usually go to Delhi and Mumbai for work purpose and hillstation is properly for vacations .Hillstation receives more tourists than metropolitan cities .
I think people love to travel where they can find peace and some relaxation and Delhi and Mumbai are the metropolitan cities so here people are for their career and jibs